Dwarka Nath vs Income Tax Officer & Anr.
Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax's order under Section 33A of the Income Tax Act 1922 is a quasi-judicial act subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution --- Held Yes; Whether the High Court should have entertained the writ petition despite alleged defects in the affidavit --- Held Yes; Whether the Commissioner should have considered the Bombay High Court decision while deciding the revision petition --- Held Yes
š Direct Access Blocked
For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.
