S. G. Jaisinghani vs The Union Of India And Others

Whether the seniority rules (r. 1(f)(iii) and (iv) of 1952) for the Income-tax Service, Class I, Grade II, and the promotion rule (r. 4 of the Central Board of Revenue Office Procedure Manual) violate Articles 14 and 16(1) of the Constitution by discriminating between direct recruits and promotees --- Held No. Whether the quota rule for recruitment (80% direct, 20% promotion, later revised to 66-2/3% direct, 33-1/3% promotion) is justiciable and its alleged violation gives rise to a legal claim --- Held No, as it is a policy statement without statutory force.

šŸ”’ Direct Access Blocked

For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.

AI Deep Dive
0/5 selected

Membership Required

Unlock official PDFs for all landmark cases.

JOIN NOW āž”
Shopping Cart