Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs State Of Bihar

Whether sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, which prohibits a dealer from collecting the surcharge levied on him, is unconstitutional due to repugnancy with the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979, issued under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution --- Held No; Whether the levy of surcharge under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, based on gross turnover inclusive of inter-State sales is ultra vires the State Legislature --- Held No

šŸ”’ Direct Access Blocked

For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.

AI Deep Dive
0/5 selected

Membership Required

Unlock official PDFs for all landmark cases.

JOIN NOW āž”
Shopping Cart