Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Warner Hindustan Ltd.

Whether advance tax paid in excess constitutes an asset/debt due to the assessee on the first day of the assessment year for computing capital employed under Rule 19A(3) --- Held Yes; Whether technical fees paid to a foreign company are revenue expenditure --- Held Tribunal's view prima facie correct but remanded for reconsideration; Whether borrowed monies and debts due must mean borrowed monies and debts due and payable under Rule 19A(3) --- Held Tribunal justified.

šŸ”’ Direct Access Blocked

For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.

AI Deep Dive
0/5 selected

Membership Required

Unlock official PDFs for all landmark cases.

JOIN NOW āž”
Shopping Cart