Babu Lal vs Director Of Income Tax

Whether the search and seizure conducted under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was valid and in accordance with law --- Held No, as the authorization was not properly issued and the action was not supported by sufficient material to form 'reason to believe' that undisclosed assets existed; Whether the writ petition was maintainable for quashing the warrant of authorization --- Held No, as the authorization was not filed with the petition and only the Panchnama was challenged, which is not subject to writ jurisdiction.

šŸ”’ Direct Access Blocked

For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.

AI Deep Dive
0/5 selected

Membership Required

Unlock official PDFs for all landmark cases.

JOIN NOW āž”
Shopping Cart