Hindamachar Ltd. vs The Union Of India & Ors.*
Whether a return filed by a company must mandatorily be signed by its managing director under s. 140(c) of the Income Tax Act, or can it be filed by an authorized signatory duly appointed by a board resolution? --- Held: No, it is not mandatory; the word 'shall' in s. 140(c) is directory, not mandatory, and a return signed by an authorized person is valid. Whether non-signing by the managing director is a curable defect under s. 292B, requiring the AO to provide an opportunity to rectify under s. 139(9)? --- Held: Yes, it is a curable defect, and the AO must issue a notice to cure it. Whether the AO's assumption of jurisdiction under s. 154 to declare the return invalid was legal? --- Held: No, it was not legal as there was no mistake apparent from record. Whether the claim for refund could be denied as time-barred under s. 239? --- Held: No, s. 239 is not applicable as the refund arose from regular assessment and s. 240 obligates the Revenue to issue refund without a separate claim.
š Direct Access Blocked
For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.
