Anand Lilaram Raisinghani vs PCIT

Authority: ITAT Tribunal/Court: Mumbai Date: 2020-01-02 AY: 2014-15 Section: 263, 119, 147, 68 Acts: Income Tax Act 1961 Result: Partly Citation: 120Taxpundit32 Justices: VIKAS AWASTHY, JM & MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM Appeal No: I.T.A. No.3385/Mum/2019
Whether the revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 was validly invoked by the Pr. CIT on grounds of lack of inquiry by the Assessing Officer regarding unsecured loans, applicability of Section 2(22)(e), TDS credit, and professional tax under Section 43B --- Held Yes, but the Tribunal partly modified the Pr. CIT's directions.

šŸ”’ Direct Access Blocked

For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.

AI Deep Dive
0/5 selected

Membership Required

Unlock official PDFs for all landmark cases.

JOIN NOW āž”
Shopping Cart