CHANDANA MEREDDY vs ITO, WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

Whether the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued beyond the limitation period is valid --- Held: No, notice is barred by limitation and reassessment order quashed. Whether the delay of 258 days in filing appeal before CIT(A) should be condoned --- Held: Yes, with costs of Rs.5,000.

🔒 Direct Access Blocked

For your security and to prevent unauthorized automated access, individual judgment links cannot be opened directly. Please access this content via Google Search or the TaxPundit Search Portal.

AI Deep Dive
0/5 selected

Membership Required

Unlock official PDFs for all landmark cases.

JOIN NOW âž”
Shopping Cart