SUGANDHA MADHUKAR SHETTY vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
This appeal by the assessee challenged the levy of penalty of Rs.53,97,010 u/s 140A(3) r.w.s 221(1) for delay in payment of self-assessment tax. The ITAT Mumbai held that post the amendment by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 w.e.f. 01.04.1989, penalty for non-payment of self-assessment tax is no longer contemplated; only mandatory interest is chargeable. The amended section 140A(3) merely treats the assessee as default for recovery purposes, not for penalty. Further, the absence of a corresponding amendment to section 221(1) means the AO cannot invoke it. Following the Coordinate Bench decisions in Heddle Knowledge Pvt. Ltd. and First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd., the penalty was set aside and the appeal allowed.
SUGANDHA MADHUKAR SHETTY vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX View Full Article »



